Australia’s Housing Shortage: Can We Actually Build Fast Enough?

The 1.2 million home target and where it stands

Australia has a housing target that everyone agrees on and a build rate that is nowhere near meeting it. The National Housing Accord commits the country to delivering 1.2 million new, well located homes between 1 July 2024 and 30 June 2029. That works out to 240,000 homes a year, or roughly 60,000 a quarter. The question that keeps surfacing in industry forums, Productivity Commission reports and government briefings is a simple one: can we physically build at that pace, using the methods we are currently using?

The short answer, backed by data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics, Master Builders Australia, the Housing Industry Association, Infrastructure Australia and the Productivity Commission, is no, not without changing how we build. This blog pulls the current numbers together, explains why traditional stick framing cannot scale fast enough on its own, and looks at the alternative construction methods, including prefabricated light gauge steel framing, that can start to close the gap.

The scale of Australia’s housing shortfall by the numbers

The Accord target of 1.2 million homes assumes a steady run rate. Here is where delivery actually sits:

  • Only 180,500 homes were started in 2024/25, nearly 60,000 short of the annual target of 240,000, according to Master Builders Australia’s industry forecasts.
  • Just 173,000 homes were completed in 2025, well below the 240,000 required (Housing Industry Association, via CommBank Newsroom).
  • By mid 2026, Australia was already more than 112,000 homes behind the Accord’s required pace. At a steady run rate, around 420,000 homes should have been built by that point (ABS Building Activity, July 2026).
  • To catch up by 30 June 2029, builders now need to deliver more than 274,000 homes every year, or around 69,000 a quarter.
  • The cumulative five year shortfall is now projected at 180,200 homes, up from an earlier estimate of 160,000 (Master Builders Australia industry forecasts, 2026).
  • As of March 2026, 243,864 homes were under construction, the highest number since ABS records began in 1984. The problem is not starting homes. It is finishing them.

A Reuters analysis in August 2026 reported that new dwelling commencements in Australia fell 11.2% in the first quarter of 2026, with annual commencement growth slowing to 0.2% from 26.1% (Reuters, August 2026). The Housing Industry Association forecasts Australia will fall short of the 2029 target by about 15%.

No state or territory is currently on track to meet its share. The ACT, for example, delivered only 2,077 new homes in the first year of the Accord against a share of 4,200 a year (Master Builders ACT, via CityNews).

What the Productivity Commission actually found

In February 2025, the Productivity Commission released a research paper, Housing construction productivity: Can we fix it?, that made the problem impossible to look past. The headline findings were stark:

  • Physical productivity in housing construction has fallen 53% over the last 30 years. We are building roughly half as many homes per hour worked compared to 1995.
  • Labour productivity in housing construction is down 12% over the same period, while labour productivity in the broader economy rose about 49%.
  • Construction labour productivity has fallen for seven consecutive years, now 21.5% below where it was (Master Builders Australia, Senate Committee opening statement, April 2026).
  • Only 35% of construction firms are “innovation active”, well below the all industry average (King and Wood Mallesons analysis).
  • The Commission estimates regulatory burden can cost up to $320,000 per project in some circumstances.

Master Builders Australia’s National Director for Policy and Legal, Melissa Byrne, told a Senate Committee hearing on productivity in April 2026 that the typical amount of output delivered per hour by a construction worker is now 20% lower than it used to be, and that this productivity decline is the single biggest reason the Housing Accord target is slipping.

The picture repeats at the state level. The Queensland Productivity Commission’s 2026 interim report found that Queensland’s construction productivity has dropped around 9% since 2018. Had productivity simply held steady, an extra 77,000 dwellings could have been built in Queensland alone since 2018.

Taken together, the message from the Productivity Commission data is that Australia is not short of workers, equipment or demand. It is short of the ability to turn those inputs into finished homes at the pace required.

Why traditional construction cannot scale fast enough on its own

Several structural issues sit behind the productivity slide, and together they explain why simply “building more” using the same methods will not close the gap.

Build times keep lengthening. Australian homes are taking longer to build and becoming more expensive to finish, which builders and analysts say directly undermines the 2029 target (Reuters, August 2026). More time on site means more labour hours per home, which further strains the trades workforce.

The labour market is already stretched. The construction industry employed a record 1.37 million workers in February 2026 and still could not fill 21,600 vacancies, with 13 of 15 core residential trades remaining in national shortage (Jobs and Skills Australia Occupation Shortage List, reported via MPA). Infrastructure Australia expects construction workforce demand to peak at 521,000 workers by 2027, with a projected overall labour shortfall of 300,000 by that date, including a trades and labourers gap of 126,000.

Trade prices are rising fast. HIA’s Trades Report shows trade prices rose 5.1% in the first half of 2026, the fastest half year rise since the 2022 post pandemic skills peak (HIA Trades Report, via Building Connection). Bricklaying, ceramic tiling, roofing and carpentry are the worst affected.

Regulatory complexity has grown. The 2022 National Construction Code’s 7 star NatHERS energy efficiency standard, Cladding Safety Victoria rules, bushfire attack level provisions and state based planning differences all add to the time and cost of each home.

Insolvency is removing capacity from the sector. Australia recorded 3,472 construction company insolvencies in the year to 30 June 2026, representing 24.5% of all company insolvencies in the country (ASIC data, via QUT analysis). Every builder collapse removes delivery capacity from the market, stranding sites and subcontractors.

The combined effect is that the traditional on site, stick built model is operating at close to its practical capacity. Even if every one of those record 243,864 homes under construction finishes on schedule, the shortfall continues to widen because of what is not being started quickly enough.

What 240,000 homes a year would actually take

Breaking the Accord target into weekly units makes the scale clearer:

  • 240,000 homes a year
  • Roughly 4,600 homes a week
  • Or about 657 homes a day, every day, for five years

That is a step change from current output. The HIA’s own modelling has concluded that Australia probably needs closer to 250,000 homes a year to actually keep pace with population growth and household formation, independent of the Accord target.

Doing this with the existing stick built workflow would require, by Infrastructure Australia’s own numbers, 300,000 more workers than the sector can currently attract or train. Even a dramatic surge in apprenticeship intake and skilled migration cannot realistically fill that gap by 2029.

The alternative construction methods that can shorten the gap

If the labour pool cannot grow fast enough and build times cannot be squeezed much further on site, the realistic path to higher output runs through changing where the work happens. This is where modern methods of construction (MMC) come in, and the Productivity Commission’s recommendations explicitly call for removing barriers to their uptake.

Prefabricated light gauge steel framing (LGS)

Prefabricated LGS wall frames, roof trusses and floor joists are designed in 3D BIM software, cut to CNC tolerances in a factory, and delivered to site ready to install. A frame that would take a traditional carpentry crew days to measure, cut and build on site arrives already numbered, bundled and sized to spec.

The productivity numbers from recent Australian research back this up. A UNSW study on a multi warehouse project in Dapto, NSW, and five similar builds across the state found that prefabricated LGS panels in non load bearing applications reduced installation time from 13 working days to 4 working days compared to on site steel framing, and delivered around 39% cost savings (UNSW research, reported via LSF Association).

LGS also sidesteps timber specific issues: it does not shrink, warp, swell with moisture, attract termites or require chemical treatment, which cuts both site time and callback risk. For a deeper comparison, our guide to steel stud vs timber stud framing sets out how the two systems perform in Victoria’s climate.

Modular (volumetric) construction

Modular construction takes prefabrication further. Entire rooms, pods or whole dwellings are built off site inside a factory and craned into place. The Productivity Commission’s research found that traditional builds can take up to 12 months, while prefabricated builds can be finished in around 16 weeks (Housing construction productivity: Can we fix it?, via Pursuit, University of Melbourne).

Queensland’s QBuild Modern Methods of Construction program is already delivering social and affordable housing at scale using modular techniques. The Australia Modular Construction Market reached around USD $3,455 million in 2025 (Ken Research), and is forecast to grow strongly through 2026 to 2031. Our modular building page covers how steel framing fits into these programs.

The limitation of volumetric modular is scale. Modular facilities need investment, planning approvals, and a steady pipeline of repeatable projects to make the capital spend worthwhile.

Panelised wall and roof systems

Panelised construction is the most widely adopted form of prefabrication in Australia today. Flat wall, floor and roof panels are built in a factory and assembled on site. It fits inside existing project workflows without requiring a volumetric facility, a crane large enough to lift whole modules, or oversized transport permits.

Industry commentary from The Good Builder estimates that prefab methods already help builders deliver homes up to 50% faster than conventional construction.

3D BIM modelling and digital design workflows

Behind every effective prefabrication system is a BIM model that catches clashes before any component is cut. Clash detection, model based shop drawings and CNC ready data mean that a frame leaves the factory already coordinated with the services, cladding and finishes that will follow it on site. This is the design side of the productivity equation that often gets overlooked, and it is covered in more detail in our guide to how 3D BIM modelling works in steel frame construction and why it matters.

What countries that already build this way can teach Australia

Australia’s prefab share sits at less than 5% of total construction output (Infrastructure Australia, Productivity Commission, prefabAUS; summary via Ken Research). For comparison:

  • Sweden builds more than 80% of its homes using prefabricated elements (Pursuit, University of Melbourne).
  • Singapore’s Housing and Development Board has approximately 80% of the population in publicly built homes, delivered at a pace and scale Australia has not seen since the 1950s.

The regulatory environment in those countries is designed around prefab as a mainstream method rather than a niche. The construction system in Australia, by contrast, grew up around stick framing and still largely treats prefab as the exception. A representative view from Vida Wood Australia’s Managing Director, quoted in Wood Central in 2026, is that Australia is “almost forced, if it ever wants to reach its one million housing level, to fully embrace prefab”.

What has to change for Australia to catch up

The Productivity Commission’s recommendations and the Property Council and HIA’s advocacy point to a consistent set of structural changes:

  • A national certification framework for prefab and modular, currently in development by the Australian Building Codes Board, that gives builders and certifiers consistency across every state.
  • A review of the National Construction Code and its implementation, including harmonisation of state based variations.
  • Removal of barriers to the uptake of modern methods of construction, including prefab and modular housing.
  • A targeted expansion of skilled migration and construction apprenticeships, with trades included in priority visa streams (Master Builders Australia submission).
  • A planning and approvals system that moves at the pace required to actually hit 240,000 homes a year.
  • A proposal from the University of Melbourne’s Pursuit team suggests setting a 30% target for modern methods of construction in all Commonwealth funded social and affordable housing by 2028, rising to 50% by 2032 (Pursuit, University of Melbourne, May 2026).

None of these are a silver bullet. But together they would shift Australia from a system that treats prefab as the exception to one that uses it where it actually makes the arithmetic work.

What this means for Melbourne builders and developers right now

For the builders, developers and project managers actually putting projects together in 2026 and 2027, the macro data has three immediate implications.

Build methods are already a cost and schedule decision, not just a design preference. On a tightly priced project, a frame that arrives on site cut to tolerance and ready to stand in days rather than weeks is the difference between hitting a milestone and watching the critical path slip. Our guide to how much steel framing costs in Australia sets out the main factors that affect pricing, and most of them shift favourably when a project uses a prefabricated frame.

Multi unit and townhouse projects benefit most. Repeated bays, consistent floor plates and standardised details are exactly the conditions where prefabrication delivers its best productivity gains. For more on how this plays out specifically, see our guide to steel framing for townhouse and multi unit developments in Melbourne.

Social, NDIS and childcare projects are already shifting. State governments, including Victoria, NSW and Queensland, are increasingly backing modular and prefab approaches for public housing, NDIS specialist disability accommodation and childcare centre construction. Our blogs on NDIS and accessible housing and steel framing for childcare centre construction cover how LGS plays into both.

How CMC Steel Solutions fits into the pace of delivery

CMC Steel Solutions designs, engineers and manufactures prefabricated light gauge steel frames at an in house facility in Craigieburn, delivered to project sites across Melbourne and Victoria. The six stage process we use, starting with 3D BIM modelling and finishing with on site delivery and a Reg 126 certificate, is designed to compress the parts of a project that typically slow a traditional build down:

  • 3D BIM design and clash detection before fabrication begins, so services, cladding and structure are coordinated in the office, not on site.
  • CNC precision fabrication in a factory environment, independent of weather delays and site conditions.
  • Numbered, bundled and sequenced delivery so install crews can erect the frame in a fraction of the time stick built framing would require.
  • Engineering certification and Reg 126 compliance on completion, removing a round of back and forth with certifiers.

For residential, commercial, industrial and child care projects alike, this converts a significant chunk of what would be on site carpentry labour into off site CNC cut componentry, which is exactly the shift the Productivity Commission’s data suggests Australia needs more of. The prefab steel frame page sets out the full technical scope of what we fabricate.

Build time comparison: traditional vs prefabricated

Build method

Typical build time

Site labour load

Comment

Traditional stick built

Up to 12 months

Highest

Weather dependent, trades heavy

Panelised prefab (LGS or timber)

4 to 8 months

Reduced

Panels built off site, erected on site

Volumetric modular

Around 16 weeks

Lowest

Majority of work done in factory

Prefabricated LGS (non load bearing)

Install time cut by around 69% vs on site steel

Significantly reduced

UNSW research, Dapto study

Sources: Productivity Commission 2025; UNSW research via LSF Association; The Good Builder.

Key takeaways

  • Australia committed to delivering 1.2 million homes by 30 June 2029 under the National Housing Accord, equivalent to 240,000 homes a year or roughly 60,000 a quarter.
  • By mid 2026 the country was already more than 112,000 homes behind the required pace, with completions well below target.
  • The Productivity Commission has found that physical housing construction productivity is down 53% over 30 years, and labour productivity down 12%, against a broader economy that improved 49%.
  • The traditional stick built workflow is operating close to its practical capacity, constrained by a projected 300,000 workforce shortfall, build time blowouts, trade price rises and construction insolvencies.
  • Prefabrication, modular construction and panelised systems can cut build times substantially: the Productivity Commission notes prefabricated homes can be completed in around 16 weeks vs up to 12 months for traditional builds.
  • UNSW research on prefabricated LGS panels found a 69% reduction in install time and around 39% cost savings vs on site steel framing for non load bearing applications.
  • Australia’s prefab share is less than 5% of construction output, vs 80% in Sweden. A national certification framework and a Commonwealth target for prefab in social housing are both on the policy agenda.
  • Melbourne and Victorian builders delivering townhouses, multi unit developments, NDIS, childcare and social housing projects are the most immediate beneficiaries of a shift to LGS and modular methods.

Frequently asked questions

Q. What is the National Housing Accord target?

The National Housing Accord commits Australian governments to deliver 1.2 million new, well located homes between 1 July 2024 and 30 June 2029, equivalent to 240,000 homes a year.

Q. How far behind is Australia on the Housing Accord target?

By mid 2026, Australia was more than 112,000 homes behind the required run rate. Only around 173,000 homes were completed in 2025 against a target of 240,000. The cumulative five year shortfall is now projected at 180,200 homes.

Q. Why is Australia’s construction productivity falling?

The Productivity Commission identified several drivers: a highly fragmented industry with limited scale, low innovation uptake, regulatory complexity, planning approval delays, and workforce shortages. Physical housing construction productivity has fallen 53% in 30 years.

Q. Can prefabrication realistically help Australia catch up?

Yes. Prefabricated homes can be built in around 16 weeks compared to up to 12 months for traditional builds, according to the Productivity Commission. Prefabricated LGS panels have been shown to install around 69% faster than on site steel framing in UNSW research.

Q. Why is Australia’s prefab share so low compared to other countries?

Australia’s prefab share sits at less than 5% of total construction output, vs over 80% in Sweden. The gap is partly historical (the industry grew around stick framing) and partly regulatory (planning and certification systems still treat prefab as the exception).

Q. How does prefabricated light gauge steel framing speed up a build?

LGS frames are designed in 3D BIM software, cut to CNC tolerances in a factory, and delivered to site numbered and ready to install. This removes measuring, cutting and framing time from the site programme, and avoids weather delays that affect on site work.

Q. Who manufactures prefabricated steel frames in Melbourne?

CMC Steel Solutions designs, engineers and manufactures light gauge and structural steel frames in house at its Craigieburn facility, supplying residential, commercial, industrial and childcare projects across Melbourne and Victoria.

Looking to specify a faster frame for your project?

If you are planning a residential, commercial, industrial or child care project in Melbourne or wider Victoria and want to understand how a prefabricated steel frame can shave weeks from your programme, call CMC Steel Solutions on 1300 285 566, email info@cmcsteelsolutions.com.au, or contact us online to talk through your project.